Graduate salaries vary much more according to the university a student attended in disciplines such as?economics, business studies and law than in humanities subjects, new statistics reveal.

The?, released by the UK¡¯s Department for Education,?pinpoints for every subject area which universities produce the highest-earning graduates after they have been in the labour market for five years.

Unsurprisingly, the universities of Oxford and Cambridge repeatedly figure at the top of the lists, which are based on tax data. However,?attending a more selective university carries much more of an advantage in some subjects than others.

?

Source:?

DfE

For example, the median salary after five years for a Cambridge graduate who left in 2008-09 after studying an economics subject was ?61,000, the highest in the sector, while the lowest median salary for economics was ?18,100 for someone who went to the 51¹ú²úÊÓƵ of East London.

51¹ú²úÊÓƵ

But another popular subject such as English shows a much smaller spread: the highest median salary after five years was again earned by a Cambridge graduate, but was lower at ?31,000; while the lowest, ?13,300, was recorded for a graduate attending the 51¹ú²úÊÓƵ of St Mark and St John.

Highest median salaries after five years

51¹ú²úÊÓƵ

Note: graduating cohort 2008-09, male and female graduates

?

Lowest median salaries after five years

Note: graduating cohort 2008-09, male and female graduates?

The data are also cross-referenced with students¡¯ entry grades to show where prior attainment at school correlates the most with the future earnings of graduates.

Subjects such as business studies and law appear to show the closest link between the grades that students enter university with and their salaries five years after graduating. But there also seem to be similar strong correlations at the top end of the salary range for some humanities subjects such as history or English.

Source:?

DfE

Institutions are banded by prior attainment of students with Band 1 the highest

?

Source:?

DfE

There appears to be no correlation whatsoever between entry grades and later earnings for those who studied creative arts subjects: in some cases graduates who attended universities with low entry tariffs went on to earn just as much as those who entered institutions accepting those with the top grades.

?

Source:?

DfE

The difference between the universities producing the highest- and lowest-earning graduates in creative arts subjects after five years is also much smaller than in other subjects: the highest median salary was ?27,600 (Bournemouth 51¹ú²úÊÓƵ) and the lowest ?10,000 (Conservatoire for Dance and Drama).

Other subjects ¨C most notably some science disciplines ¨C?show that there are a number of less selective universities whose graduates go on to earn towards the higher end of the salary scale after five years, and conversely selective institutions with graduates earning a lot less.

51¹ú²úÊÓƵ

?

Source:?

DfE

In engineering and technology, for instance, Bournemouth 51¹ú²úÊÓƵ graduates earned almost ?40,000 at the median after five years, while at the 51¹ú²úÊÓƵ of Sussex the median salary was under ?30,000.

Other examples include biological sciences, where the median salary for graduates from the 51¹ú²úÊÓƵ of Sheffield was ?23,600, less than the median for those who attended the 51¹ú²úÊÓƵ of Chichester, who earned ?24,800 after five years. And in history and philosophy subjects, the median salary for a graduate from Lancaster 51¹ú²úÊÓƵ was ?22,500, less than graduates who went to Edge Hill 51¹ú²úÊÓƵ (?24,100) or London Metropolitan 51¹ú²úÊÓƵ (?23,100).?

51¹ú²úÊÓƵ

Anna Vignoles, professor of education at the 51¹ú²úÊÓƵ of Cambridge, said that, although the data highlighted that graduate earnings were strongly linked to other factors such as prior attainment, they would still be helpful in guiding students in their choices.

¡°I think it is useful, not least in enabling us to understand that our system, rightly or wrongly, is pretty much a hierarchical HE system where people with the highest level of prior attainment¡­go on to get the highest level of earnings.

¡°We can worry about that and critique that but, from the students¡¯ perspective, it is important to know that.¡±

Professor Vignoles also pointed out that the raw LEO data needed to be treated with caution in many respects. For example, they do not contain earnings data on those who were self-employed, a much more likely mode of employment for creative arts graduates.

Nevertheless, she said the policy implications were still important, not so much in terms of revealing the universities where graduates earn the most or the least, but for pinpointing the best way to help high-achieving students from poorer backgrounds.

¡°If we are serious about social mobility then of course students with high A-level grades must get to some of these [more selective] institutions,¡± she said.

51¹ú²úÊÓƵ

Responding to the data, Nicola Dandridge, the chief executive of Universities UK, said that ¡°graduate salaries are not the only measure of success in higher education¡± and added that?¡°many students seek rewarding careers where high salaries are not their only motivation¡±.

simon.baker@timeshighereducation.com