The vice-chancellors of Lancaster, Umist and York correctly point out that research league tables are usually based on misleading assumptions about staff not submitted to the RAE. Such people are either scored as zero or treated as having no effect on the rankings. The truth must lie between these extremes.
One might reasonably suppose that the unselected would have been rated, on average, two points below their officially research-active colleagues in the same department.
A league table constructed on this basis is available at .
David Voas
Sheffield.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰’蝉 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?
Please or to read this article.